In re Utermahlen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Utermahlen

784 A.2d 109

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 11, 2001

DocketNo. 465 Disciplinary Docket No. 2- Supreme Court (No. 32 RST 2001)

StatusPublished

This text of 784 A.2d 109 (In re Utermahlen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Utermahlen, 784 A.2d 109 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated September 4, 2001, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2001, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated September 4, 2001, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

784 A.2d 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-utermahlen-pa-2001.