in Re USAA General Indemnity Company
This text of in Re USAA General Indemnity Company (in Re USAA General Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-20-00024-CV
IN RE USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 22, 2020
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On January 14, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the
petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,
the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI10598, styled Adam Reising v. Sue Ann Baldor and USAA General Indemnity Co., pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re USAA General Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-usaa-general-indemnity-company-texapp-2020.