In re Ury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ury

242 A.D. 734

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law of the State of New York, by this court, on the 16th day of May, 1912. He was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, first degree, in the Albany County Court on July 5, 1934. Pursuant to the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, and of section 477, of the Judiciary Law, the respondent must be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur. Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law of the State of New York, by this court, on the 16th day of May, 1912. He was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, first degree, in the Albany County Court on July 5, 1934. Pursuant to the provisions of section 88, subdivision 3, and of section 477, of the Judiciary Law, the respondent must be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur. Respondent disbarred.

In re Ury, 242 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 734 (In re Ury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.