in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed October 6, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01022-CV
IN RE URBAN 8 LLC AND URBAN 8 MANAGEMENT LLC, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-08919
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Osborne Relators ask for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order denying a motion to
set aside a default judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show
that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy
by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004)
(orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude relators
have not shown they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
221022f.p05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC (in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.