in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 6, 2022·No. 05-22-01022-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed October 6, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01022-CV

IN RE URBAN 8 LLC AND URBAN 8 MANAGEMENT LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-08919

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith Opinion by Justice Osborne Relators ask for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order denying a motion to

set aside a default judgment. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show

that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy

by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004)

(orig. proceeding).

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude relators

have not shown they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the

petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

221022f.p05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC (in Re: Urban 8 LLC and Urban 8 Management LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)