In re Unroch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Unroch

92 A.D.2d 467, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16663

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1983·Published

Opinion

Respondent is directed to show cause why a final order of suppression, censure or removal from office should not be made, and pending final determination of the petition, respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur ■— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent is directed to show cause why a final order of suppression, censure or removal from office should not be made, and pending final determination of the petition, respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur ■— Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal.

In re Unroch, 92 A.D.2d 467, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 467 (In re Unroch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.