in Re Unity National Bank
This text of in Re Unity National Bank (in Re Unity National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: In re Unity National Bank
Appellate case number: 01-21-00653-CV
Trial court case number: 2017-31933
Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County
Relator, Unity National Bank (“Unity”), has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that this Court “direct the trial court to sign the proposed order, presented by Unity, granting its Rule 306a motion specifying the date on which Unity or its attorney received notice or actual knowledge of the trial court’s judgment.” Unity also requests “a stay of the appellate proceedings in [appellate] [c]ause [number] 01-20-00593-CV,” “including [the] deadlines to file a motion for rehearing.” Unity’s request for a stay of the appellate proceedings in appellate cause number 01-20-00593-CV is granted. The stay is effective until disposition of Unity’s petition for writ of mandamus or further order of this Court. The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending. The Court requests a response to the petition for a writ of mandamus from the real party in interest. The response, if any, is due no later than 20 days from the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Julie Countiss_______ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __November 23, 2021______
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Unity National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-unity-national-bank-texapp-2021.