In Re: United Specialty Insurance Company v. the State of Texas
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed March 21, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00036-CV
IN RE UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-01250
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Nowell In this original proceeding, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial
court’s order granting real party in interest’s motion to quash non-party discovery
requests and motion for protection.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In
re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that
relator has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
230036F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: United Specialty Insurance Company v. the State of Texas (In Re: United Specialty Insurance Company v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.