In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00510-CV
IN RE UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC.
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Adrian A. Spears, II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator filed its petition for writ of mandamus on August 11, 2025. The real party in interest
filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and a reply. Having considered the
arguments of the parties and the record filed, this court has determined that relator has not
established that it is entitled to the requested relief. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The real party in interest’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CI-02352, styled Melissa Pearson v. United Health Group, Inc., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-united-health-group-inc-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.