In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 2025·No. 04-25-00510-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00510-CV

IN RE UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Adrian A. Spears, II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator filed its petition for writ of mandamus on August 11, 2025. The real party in interest filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and a reply. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the record filed, this court has determined that relator has not established that it is entitled to the requested relief. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The real party in interest’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CI-02352, styled Melissa Pearson v. United Health Group, Inc., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00510-CV

IN RE UNITED HEALTH GROUP INC.

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Adrian A. Spears, II, Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2025 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator filed its petition for writ of mandamus on August 11, 2025. The real party in interest filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and a reply. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the record filed, this court has determined that relator has not established that it is entitled to the requested relief. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The real party in interest’s motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CI-02352, styled Melissa Pearson v. United Health Group, Inc., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding.

In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas (In Re United Health Group Inc. v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.