in Re United Fire and Casualty Company
This text of in Re United Fire and Casualty Company (in Re United Fire and Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-584-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE UNITED FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, United Fire and Casualty Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in the above cause on September 15, 2011. Relator contends that the trial court
abused its discretion in denying its motion to disqualify counsel for real parties in
interest, Jamail and Smith Construction f/k/a Jamail Construction.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of
mandamus and the mandamus record, is of the opinion that relator has not met its
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). burden to obtain mandamus relief. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus
is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 27th day of September, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re United Fire and Casualty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-united-fire-and-casualty-company-texapp-2011.