In re Ungar

110 So. 3d 1080, 2013 WL 1680074, 2013 La. LEXIS 879
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 5, 2013·No. No. 2013-OB-0521·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel;—Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. 12-DB-030.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until at least two years have passed from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

WEIMER, GUIDRY and HUGHES, JJ., would grant reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ungar, 110 So. 3d 1080, 2013 WL 1680074, 2013 La. LEXIS 879 (La. 2013).

110 So. 3d 1080 (In re Ungar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Ungar
192 So. 3d 112 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2016)