In re Underwood
30 Mich. 502, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 2
This text of 30 Mich. 502 (In re Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Underwood, 30 Mich. 502, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 2 (Mich. 1875).
Opinion
held that the question sought to be raised would necessarily involve a review of the order of the recorder’s court, by virtue of which the prisoner is confined, and that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy; and that the question must be raised by writ of error or other appropriate remedy.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Finkenbiner v. Dowd
108 N.E.2d 261 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)
Goodman v. Daly, Warden
165 N.E. 906 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1929)
In re Parrish
214 Mich. 24 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
In re Forscutt
133 N.W. 315 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
In re Newcomb
105 P. 1042 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Ex parte Tani
29 Nev. 385 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1907)
In re Butler
101 N.W. 630 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Koepke v. Hill
60 N.E. 1039 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
In re Maguire
72 N.W. 15 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Elsner v. Shrigley
45 N.W. 393 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1890)
Sennott's Case
16 N.E. 448 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Parker v. State
5 Tex. Ct. App. 579 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1879)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 Mich. 502, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-underwood-mich-1875.