In re Underwood
30 Mich. 502, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 2
Opinion
held that the question sought to be raised would necessarily involve a review of the order of the recorder’s court, by virtue of which the prisoner is confined, and that habeas corpus is not the proper remedy; and that the question must be raised by writ of error or other appropriate remedy.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Underwood, 30 Mich. 502, 1875 Mich. LEXIS 2 (Mich. 1875).
30 Mich. 502 (In re Underwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finkenbiner v. Dowd
108 N.E.2d 261 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)
Goodman v. Daly, Warden
165 N.E. 906 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1929)
In re Parrish
214 Mich. 24 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
In re Forscutt
133 N.W. 315 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
In re Newcomb
105 P. 1042 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Ex parte Tani
29 Nev. 385 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1907)
In re Butler
101 N.W. 630 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)
Koepke v. Hill
60 N.E. 1039 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
In re Maguire
72 N.W. 15 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Elsner v. Shrigley
45 N.W. 393 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1890)
Sennott's Case
16 N.E. 448 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Parker v. State
5 Tex. Ct. App. 579 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1879)