Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1963
DocketNo. 37720
StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132 (In re Unauthorized Practice of Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Unauthorized Practice of Law, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132 (Ohio 1963).

Opinion

. The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved. See Sperry v. State of Florida, ex rel. The Florida Bar, 373 U. S., 379.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar
373 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-unauthorized-practice-of-law-ohio-1963.