Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 12, 1963·No. No. 37720·Published

Opinion

. The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved. See Sperry v. State of Florida, ex rel. The Florida Bar, 373 U. S., 379.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Gibson, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Unauthorized Practice of Law, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132 (Ohio 1963).

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 132 (In re Unauthorized Practice of Law) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar
373 U.S. 379 (Supreme Court, 1963)