Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Ultra Trading International Ltd.

In re Ultra Trading International Ltd.

294 A.D.2d 510, 742 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5207
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 2002·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated July 6, 2001, which, upon the denial of its petition, and, in effect, the confirmation of the award, is in favor of Bond Commodities Limited and against it in the principal sum of $36,929.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Ultra Trading International Limited failed to demonstrate a basis to vacate the arbitration award at issue pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (see Matter of Blamowski, 91 NY2d 190; Matter of Meisels v Uhr, 79 NY2d 526; Thermasol, Ltd. v Dreiske, 78 AD2d 838, affd 52 NY2d 1069, cert denied 454 US 826; cf. Matter of Northern Assur. Co. of Am. v Bollinger, 256 AD2d 580). Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ultra Trading International Ltd., 294 A.D.2d 510, 742 N.Y.S.2d 849, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 510 (In re Ultra Trading International Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Blamowski & Munson Transportation, Inc.
690 N.E.2d 1254 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Thermasol, Ltd. v. Dreiske
420 N.E.2d 401 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Meisels v. Uhr
79 N.Y.2d 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Thermasol, Ltd. v. Dreiske
78 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Bollinger
256 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)