in Re Ullja Kuntze

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00415-CV

IN RE ULLJA KUNTZE

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 14, 2017, Kuntze filed a document which is properly characterized

as a petition for writ of mandamus. In a separate proceeding, In Re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-

CV, we have explained that such a document is not filed within an existing appeal, but

rather is docketed as its own proceeding. See In re Kuntze, 10-17-00384-CV, 2017 Tex. App.

LEXIS 12038 (Tex. App.—Waco Dec. 27, 2017, orig. proceeding).

In this proceeding, Kuntze is critical of the Clerk of this Court for not responding

to Kuntze’s demands by the deadline set by Kuntze and for failing to notify the trial court

clerk of what Kuntze perceives as deficiencies in the clerk’s record. Kuntze seeks to have the Court’s Clerk removed from office. Kuntze’s complaint is frivolous. We do not have

jurisdiction to remove the Clerk in this manner.

Kuntze’s petition is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 3, 2018 [OT06]

In re Kuntze Page 2