In re Uhl

56 A.3d 784, 2012 WL 6060413
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 2012
DocketNo. 12-BG-771
StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.3d 784 (In re Uhl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Uhl, 56 A.3d 784, 2012 WL 6060413 (D.C. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the New York Supreme Court disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court’s June 27, 2012, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and the July 30, 2012, letter from respondent that does not address the discipline imposed by the state of New York, but attached a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Christopher M. Uhl is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to July 30, 2012. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebutta-ble presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)
In re Willingham
900 A.2d 165 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 A.3d 784, 2012 WL 6060413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-uhl-dc-2012.