In Re Ugwuonye

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In Re Ugwuonye

959 A.2d 732, 2008 WL 4735191

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2008

Docket08-BG-1097

StatusPublished

This text of 959 A.2d 732 (In Re Ugwuonye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Ugwuonye, 959 A.2d 732, 2008 WL 4735191 (D.C. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified opinion of the Maryland Court of Appeals suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for 90 days, see Atty. Grievance Comm’n v. Ugwuonye, 405 Md. 351, 952 A.2d 226 (2008), this court’s September 10, 2008, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Ephraim C. Ugwuo-nye, Esq., is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 90 days as identical reciprocal discipline. See In re Thompson, 498 A.2d 250 (D.C.1985). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified opinion of the Maryland Court of Appeals suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for 90 days, see Atty. Grievance Comm’n v. Ugwuonye, 405 Md. 351, 952 A.2d 226 (2008), this court’s September 10, 2008, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Ephraim C. Ugwuo-nye, Esq., is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 90 days as identical reciprocal discipline. See In re Thompson, 498 A.2d 250 (D.C.1985). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

959 A.2d 732, 2008 WL 4735191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ugwuonye-dc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack