in Re UBS Financial Services Inc., Debra Pelham, and Kreg Pearless
This text of in Re UBS Financial Services Inc., Debra Pelham, and Kreg Pearless (in Re UBS Financial Services Inc., Debra Pelham, and Kreg Pearless) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion GRANTED and Order filed January 31, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-20-00087-CV ____________
IN RE UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., DEBRA PELHAM, AND KREG PEARLESS, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-82010
ORDER
On January 29, 2020, relators UBS Financial Services Inc., Debra Pelham, and Kreg Pearless filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relators ask this court to order the Honorable Daryl L. Moore, Judge of the 333rd District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order dated January 8, 2020, entered in trial court number 2019-82010, styled In re Petition of Deneige Dooley Requesting Deposition before Suit.
Relators have also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On January 29, 2020, relators asked this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus.
It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relators’ request for relief requires further consideration and that relators will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relators’ motion and issue the following order:
We ORDER the January 8, 2020 order entered trial court cause number 2019- 82010, In re Petition of Deneige Dooley Requesting Deposition before Suit, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relators’ petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court.
In addition, the court requests Deneige Dooley, real party-in-interest, to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before February 14, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.
PER CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant. (Justice Poissant would vote to deny the motion to stay).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re UBS Financial Services Inc., Debra Pelham, and Kreg Pearless, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ubs-financial-services-inc-debra-pelham-and-kreg-pearless-texapp-2020.