in Re Uber Technologies, Inc.
This text of in Re Uber Technologies, Inc. (in Re Uber Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 7, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-21-00509-CV
IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 125th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-67824
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On September 9, 2021, relator Uber Technologies, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his (1) July 5, 2021 order compelling production of documents; (2) August 27, 2021 ruling denying Uber’s motion for reconsideration; (3) August 30, 2021 order requiring Uber to comply by September 10, 2021; and (4) September 9, 2021 order denying Uber’s motion to vacate or stay the discovery orders.
Relator has not shown that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Our September 10, 2021 stay order is lifted.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Uber Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-uber-technologies-inc-texapp-2022.