in Re Tyson Foods, Inc. and Paul Dannaldson
This text of in Re Tyson Foods, Inc. and Paul Dannaldson (in Re Tyson Foods, Inc. and Paul Dannaldson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 31, 2014
No. 04-14-00535-CV
IN RE TYSON FOODS, INC. and Paul Dannaldson
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On July 29, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
Relators’ Motion for Temporary Relief, also filed on July 29, 2014, is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED on July 31, 2014.
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of July, 2014.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 12-10-27890-MCV, styled Robert Lane v. Karen Dando; Gabriel Miranda, Raul Uribe; TSI Equipment, Inc.; Tyson Foods, Inc. and Paul Dannaldson, Defendants; and Juan Carranco, Intervenor; pending in the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tyson Foods, Inc. and Paul Dannaldson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyson-foods-inc-and-paul-dannaldson-texapp-2014.