in Re Tyrer J Pearson
This text of in Re Tyrer J Pearson (in Re Tyrer J Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-08-00434-CR
IN RE TYRER J. PEARSON
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator seeks a writ of mandamus against the District Clerk and District Attorney
of Ellis County relating to their alleged failure to issue a bench warrant on Relator’s
motion. The petition for writ of mandamus lacks proof of service. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5
(a), (d). We use Rule 2 to suspend the service requirement of Rule 9.5 and proceed to
the merits of the mandamus. TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 9.5.
A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a
district clerk or district attorney except to protect its jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. § 22.221(a) (Vernon 2004); In re Bernard, 993 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex. App.—Houston
[1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Relator’s petition does not allege facts that require us to protect our jurisdiction, so we do not have jurisdiction to decide his request for
mandamus relief against the District Clerk or District Attorney.
We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.
BILL VANCE Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Vance, and Justice Reyna Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 23, 2008 Do not publish [CR25]
In re Pearson Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Tyrer J Pearson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyrer-j-pearson-texapp-2008.