In re Tyler S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tyler S.

23 A.D.3d 564, 804 N.Y.S.2d 254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 A.D.3d 564 (In re Tyler S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tyler S., 23 A.D.3d 564, 804 N.Y.S.2d 254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of [565]*565the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated September 10, 2004, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 16, 2004, made after a hearing, found that she neglected her child.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Family Court Act § 1046 (b) (i) requires that a finding of neglect of a child be supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1 [1985]). We conclude that the finding of neglect with respect to the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of disposition of [565]*565the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated September 10, 2004, as, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated August 16, 2004, made after a hearing, found that she neglected her child.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Family Court Act § 1046 (b) (i) requires that a finding of neglect of a child be supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Tammie Z., 66 NY2d 1 [1985]). We conclude that the finding of neglect with respect to the child was supported by a preponderance of the evidence.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.3d 564, 804 N.Y.S.2d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyler-s-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack