In re Tyler
13 P. 169, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740
Opinion
The motion for a new trial is not the proper remedy in this cause. Considered as a petition for a rehearing, we see no reason to grant it.
Motion for a new trial and a rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Tyler, 13 P. 169, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740 (Cal. 1887).
13 P. 169 (In re Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friday v. State Bar
144 P.2d 564 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
In Re Stepsay
98 P.2d 489 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Houtchens v. Mercer
30 S.W.2d 545 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Hulse v. Davis
253 P. 136 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Bar Assn. of S. F. v. Cantrell
200 P. 968 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)