In re Tyler
13 P. 169, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740
This text of 13 P. 169 (In re Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Tyler, 13 P. 169, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740 (Cal. 1887).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial is not the proper remedy in this cause. Considered as a petition for a rehearing, we see no reason to grant it.
Motion for a new trial and a rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Friday v. State Bar
144 P.2d 564 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
In Re Stepsay
98 P.2d 489 (California Supreme Court, 1940)
Houtchens v. Mercer
30 S.W.2d 545 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Hulse v. Davis
253 P. 136 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Bar Assn. of S. F. v. Cantrell
200 P. 968 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 P. 169, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyler-cal-1887.