In re Tyieyanna L.

94 A.D.3d 494, 941 N.Y.S.2d 498
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 10, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 94 A.D.3d 494 (In re Tyieyanna L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tyieyanna L., 94 A.D.3d 494, 941 N.Y.S.2d 498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about March 8, 2011, which denied respondent mother’s motion to vacate orders of disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about July 14, 2010, upon her default, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated her parental rights to the subject children and committed the custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense to the petition (see CFLR 5015 [a] [1]; Matter of Calvin S., 47 AD3d 491 [2008]; Matter of Jones, 128 AD2d 403 [1987]). She submitted an affidavit explaining that she had a severe toothache on the day of the hearing and a letter from her dentist stating that she was in his office on that day and was referred to an oral surgeon. However, she failed to notify her counsel, the court, or the agency in advance that she would not appear at the hearings, although her condition did not prevent her from doing so (see Matter of Amirah Nicole A. [Tamika R.], 73 AD3d 428 [2010], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 766 [2010]; Matter of Ciara Lee C. [Lourdes R.], 67 AD3d 437 [2009], lv dismissed 14 NY3d 756 [2010]).

[495]*495There is no evidence that respondent completed the programs called for in her plan within the relevant one-year period so as to demonstrate a meritorious defense to the allegations of permanent neglect (see Matter of Gloria Marie S., 55 AD3d 320, 321 [2008], lv dismissed 11 NY3d 909 [2009]). Her incarceration during that period did not excuse her from the requirement that she realistically plan for her children’s future (see Matter of Jayson M., 177 AD2d 396 [1991]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Acosta, Freedman and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Tyrone F. v. Mariah O.
2018 NY Slip Op 6617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Qwin L. X. P. (Leonard P.)
2018 NY Slip Op 1066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Christina McK. v. Kyle S.
2017 NY Slip Op 7323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Raymond C. M.
132 A.D.3d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re Nasir Levon L.
110 A.D.3d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Tony's Towing Service, Inc. v. Swarts
109 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Commissioner of Social Services v. Kastriot D.
101 A.D.3d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Diamond Lee P.
99 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.3d 494, 941 N.Y.S.2d 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyieyanna-l-nyappdiv-2012.