In re Tyhessa Elatisha W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tyhessa Elatisha W.

186 A.D.2d 433

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 433 (In re Tyhessa Elatisha W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tyhessa Elatisha W., 186 A.D.2d 433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Orders of the Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.), entered on or about February 14, 1991, which permanently terminated respondent’s parental rights with respect to two children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record clearly demonstrates that the children were "permanently neglected” within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a). Moreover, in light of the findings that one of the children was sexually abused by men known to her mother and in the presence of her mother, the social service agency appropriately determined that it would not be in the children’s best interests to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see, 18 NYCRR 431.9 [b] [2]).

We have considered all claims of appellant and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Orders of the Family Court, New York County (Michael Gage, J.), entered on or about February 14, 1991, which permanently terminated respondent’s parental rights with respect to two children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record clearly demonstrates that the children were "permanently neglected” within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (7) (a). Moreover, in light of the findings that one of the children was sexually abused by men known to her mother and in the presence of her mother, the social service agency appropriately determined that it would not be in the children’s best interests to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (see, 18 NYCRR 431.9 [b] [2]).

We have considered all claims of appellant and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tyhessa-elatisha-w-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack