Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/In re Tutt

In re Tutt

784 A.2d 67, 170 N.J. 63, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1392
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-274, concluding that JAMES P. TUTT of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.8(e) (providing financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES P. TUTT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[64] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tutt, 784 A.2d 67, 170 N.J. 63, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 1392 (N.J. 2001).

784 A.2d 67 (In re Tutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.