In re Tutorship of Ratcliffe Minors
72 So. 713, 139 La. 996, 1916 La. LEXIS 1820
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss.
The motion is on the ground that the transcript is defective, in that certain portions of the pleadings and evidence which are necessary to a proper trial of the case on appeal are missing. Since the motion was filed the appellant has, under the law, filed a supplemental transcript, which appears to contain the missing documents.
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Tutorship of Ratcliffe Minors, 72 So. 713, 139 La. 996, 1916 La. LEXIS 1820 (La. 1916).
72 So. 713 (In re Tutorship of Ratcliffe Minors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeKoven v. DeKoven
205 Ill. 309 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1903)
Glenn v. Elam
3 La. Ann. 611 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1848)
Succession of Bofenschen
29 La. Ann. 711 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1877)
Tutorship of Minor Heirs
45 La. Ann. 134 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1893)
Sims v. Billington
24 So. 637 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1898)
Sargent Land Co. v. Von Baumbach
207 F. 423 (D. Minnesota, 1913)
Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.
219 F. 31 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Mitchell Bros. v. Doyle
225 F. 437 (W.D. Michigan, 1915)