In Re Turner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Turner

158 S.E. 926, 200 N.C. 779, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 441

DecidedMay 13, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 926 (In Re Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Turner, 158 S.E. 926, 200 N.C. 779, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 441 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

CoNNOR, J.

There is no error in the judgment dismissing this proceeding. The relief sought by the petitioners on the facts alleged in. their petition can be had only in a civil action begun and prosecuted in the Superior Court.

The petitioners and all other creditors of M. A. Turner, lunatic, should be made parties in the action entitled, “Mrs. George H. Read v. M. A. Turner et al.,” this day remanded to the Superior Court of Meck-lenburg County for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in Read v. Turner, ante, 773.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CoNNOR, J.

There is no error in the judgment dismissing this proceeding. The relief sought by the petitioners on the facts alleged in. their petition can be had only in a civil action begun and prosecuted in the Superior Court.

The petitioners and all other creditors of M. A. Turner, lunatic, should be made parties in the action entitled, “Mrs. George H. Read v. M. A. Turner et al.,” this day remanded to the Superior Court of Meck-lenburg County for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion in Read v. Turner, ante, 773.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.E. 926, 200 N.C. 779, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-turner-nc-1931.