In Re Turner

384 B.R. 852, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 886, 2008 WL 852486
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado
DecidedMarch 24, 2008
Docket14-24474
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 384 B.R. 852 (In Re Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Turner, 384 B.R. 852, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 886, 2008 WL 852486 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ MOTION TO RECONSIDER

A. BRUCE CAMPBELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Debtors’ Motion to Reconsider Order Regarding Dismissal of Chapter 13 Case (“Motion”). Debtors seek reconsideration of this Court’s January 16, 2008 Order Regarding Dismissal of Chapter 13 Case (“Order”). The Court has considered the Motion and the record in this case 1 and finds that Debtors’ have not stated grounds upon which to reconsider the Order.

On January 9, 2008, this case had come before the Court on the Debtors’ Chapter 13 plan and the Chapter 13 Trustee’s objection to confirmation of that plan. The Trustee objected to confirmation of Debtors’ plan, in part, because Debtors had not filed their Form B22C, Statement of Current Monthly Income and Calculation of Commitment Period and Disposable Income (“B22C”). Without Form B22C, the Trustee argued, she is unable to determine whether Debtors’ plan provides for the minimum distribution to class 4 unsecured creditors.

On January 9, 2008, at the status conference on the Trustee’s Objection to Confirmation, the Trustee contended that because Debtors filed their Form B22C later than 45 days into their case, their case had been dismissed by operation of 11 U.S.C. § 521(i)(l). The matter was set for hearing for further consideration of the issue.

On January 16, 2008, based upon the absence of any factual dispute, the Court issued its Order. The Order did not dismiss Debtors’ case but found and declared that Debtors’ case had been dismissed effective November 26, 2007 by operation of statute, 11 U.S.C. § 521(i)(l).

The issue which is presented by Debtors is whether the information contained in Official Form B22C is that which a debtor must file to fulfill his or her duties under 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1). If it is not, which Debtors argue, then their case was not dismissed by operation of section 521(i)(l).

Debtors filed their Chapter 13 case on October 10, 2007. They filed their case without all the necessary information required by 11 U.S.C. § 521(a)(1). On November 6, 2008, Debtors sought to cure the deficiencies in the filing of their case. They did not, however, file a Form B22C with those documents. They eventually filed their Form B22C on December 13, 2007, well over 45 days into their case.

At the January 9, 2008 status conference on the Trustee’s objection to confirmation of Debtors’ plan, the Chapter 13 Trustee argued that this case was dismissed on the 46th day by operation of section 521(i)(l). Section 521(i)(l) provides that:

... if an individual debtor in a voluntary case under chapter 7 or 13 fails to file all of the information required under subsection (a)(1) within 45 days after the date of the filing of the petition, the case shall be automatically dismissed effective on the 46th day after the date of the filing of the petition.

*854 Debtors argue in their Motion that Form B22C is not one of the documents mandated to be filed by section 521(a)(1). They assert that the information contained in their Schedules I and J, which were timely filed, is sufficient to meet the requirements of both sections 521 (a)(1)(B)(ii) and (v). Thus, they assert their case was not “automatically” dismissed on the 46th day of their case by operation of that statute.

To address the issue raised by Debtors, this Court must analyze provisions of the Bankruptcy Code which were added by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”). In general, the provisions of BAPCPA which amended the Bankruptcy Code are not the model of statutory drafting that courts hope to have when being asked to interpret statutes. Nevertheless, courts must, and this Court will, endeavor to interpret the statute to fulfill the intentions of the drafters.

Section 521(a)(1) sets forth a list of documents that a debtor, as part of his duties, must file. The debtor must file:

(A) a list of creditors; and
(B) unless the court orders otherwise
(i) a schedules of assets and liabilities;
(ii) a schedule of current income and current expenditures;
(iii) a statement of the debtor’s financial affairs ...;
(iv) copies of all payment advices or other evidence of payment received within 60 days before the date of the filing of the petition, by the debtor from any employer of the debtor;
(v) a statement of the amount of monthly net income, itemized to show how the amount is calculated; and
(vi) a statement disclosing any reasonably anticipated increase in income or expenditures over the 12-month period following the date of the filing of the petition. (Emphasis added).

It is the Debtors’ contention that Form B22C is not a form which must be filed to fulfill the debtor’s duties under section 521(a)(1). 2 They assert their duty is fulfilled by filing Official Forms Schedules I and J. Debtors point to the fact that the documents listed in section 521(a)(1)(A) and (B)(i)-(iii) are those which debtors were required by section 521(1), the pre-BAPCPA predecessor to those sections. Among those, is the requirement that the debtor file a schedule of current income and current expenditures.

The debtor is also required to file pursuant to section 521(a)(1), particularly section 521(a)(l)(B)(v), a statement of the amount of monthly net income, itemized to show how the amount is calculated. That is a requirement that was added with BAPCPA. Debtors here contend that the section 521(a)(1) filing requirements added by BAPCPA, 521(a)(l)(B)(iv) through (vi) do not have Official Forms which correspond with them. Rather the duty to file a “statement of the amount of monthly net income, itemized to show how the amount is calculated” which BAPCPA adds to the list of documents a debtor must file, is now fulfilled by fifing the Official Forms for Schedules I and J, which were also amended with BAPCPA. The Debtors’ find support for that view in *855 the 2005-2007 Advisory Committee Note to Official Form 6, the Schedules. Official Bankruptcy Form 6, 2005-2007 Note of the Advisory Committee on the Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Judicial Conference, reprinted in Norton Bankruptcy Rules 2007-2008 Edition, at 1062 (Thomson/West 2007).

Regardless of the Committee Note, this Court cannot agree with the Debtors or the suggestion in the Committee Note to the Official Forms. A cornerstone of BAPCPA is the “means test.” The means test is used in Chapter 7 to determine whether a debtor’s bankruptcy filing should be dismissed as abusive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Marcott
545 B.R. 668 (D. New Mexico, 2016)
In Re Spencer
388 B.R. 418 (District of Columbia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 B.R. 852, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 886, 2008 WL 852486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-turner-cob-2008.