In re Turner

Fourth Circuit

In re Turner

173 F. App'x 295

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Turner. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 F. App'x 221 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2006·No. No. 05-2360·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to consolidate and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See In re: Turner, No. CA-05-56-SGW (W.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2005; Nov. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing the action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to consolidate and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See In re: Turner, No. CA-05-56-SGW (W.D.Va. Nov. 15, 2005; Nov. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately set forth in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

In re Turner, 173 F. App'x 295 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 295 (In re Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.