In re Tucker

241 A.D.2d 250, 670 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 7, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 250 (In re Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Tucker, 241 A.D.2d 250, 670 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

[251]*251Respondent Donald Tucker was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on June 26, 1963. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law in the First Judicial Department.

By order entered July 1, 1997 (231 AD2d 198), this Court suspended respondent from practice, effective immediately, and until further order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i), due to respondent’s willful failure to cooperate with an investigation of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), the Committee’s notice of motion to suspend respondent advised him that an attorney who has been suspended and has not appeared or applied in writing for a hearing or reinstatement within six months of the date of the order of suspension may be disbarred without further notice. In excess of six months have lapsed since the date of the order of suspension. Respondent, who also has not appeared on the present motion, has failed to appear or apply in writing for a hearing or for reinstatement.

In view of the foregoing, the Committee’s motion to disbar respondent pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g), dated February 6, 1998, is granted (Matter of Gutstein, 219 AD2d 330; Matter of Reilly, 219 AD2d 96) and respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys, effective immediately.

Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Williams and Tom, JJ., concur.

Motion granted, and respondent disbarred from practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Reaves
271 A.D.2d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re Porcelli
271 A.D.2d 141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re Donovan
268 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re Ghinger
263 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re Downing
250 A.D.2d 9 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 250, 670 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tucker-nyappdiv-1998.