In re Tucker

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Tucker

806 A.2d 406, 174 N.J. 347, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1299

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 2, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-397, concluding that TERRY G. TUCKER of BRIDGETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TERRY G. TUCKER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 01-397, concluding that TERRY G. TUCKER of BRIDGETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TERRY G. TUCKER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Tucker, 806 A.2d 406, 174 N.J. 347, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1299 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

806 A.2d 406 (In re Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.