In re Tucker

132 So. 3d 395, 2014 WL 286005, 2014 La. LEXIS 107
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 27, 2014·No. No. 2013-B-2820·Published

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

| ;The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter, failed to adequately communicate with a client, failed to properly withdraw from a representation, and failed to relinquish an un-negotiated settlement check in a timely manner. Respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Robert Wayman Tucker, Sr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 21920, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tucker, 132 So. 3d 395, 2014 WL 286005, 2014 La. LEXIS 107 (La. 2014).

132 So. 3d 395 (In re Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.