In re Tucker

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Tucker

381 So. 2d 1203, 1980 La. LEXIS 9654

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 8, 1980·No. No. 66745·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion this applicant should be permitted to take the bar examination. Her qualifications are apparently better than any applicant who has petitioned this court to take the bar exam in the last 9 years. We have never denied any applicant with similar qualifications permission to take the examination. We have held that the rule must be changed, and when it is changed, this applicant will be qualified. See Cynthia Caroline Dawn Marie Anderson for Admission to the Louisiana Bar, 377 So.2d 1185 (1980).

CALOGERO, J., would grant permission to take the bar exam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion this applicant should be permitted to take the bar examination. Her qualifications are apparently better than any applicant who has petitioned this court to take the bar exam in the last 9 years. We have never denied any applicant with similar qualifications permission to take the examination. We have held that the rule must be changed, and when it is changed, this applicant will be qualified. See Cynthia Caroline Dawn Marie Anderson for Admission to the Louisiana Bar, 377 So.2d 1185 (1980).

CALOGERO, J., would grant permission to take the bar exam.

In re Tucker, 381 So. 2d 1203, 1980 La. LEXIS 9654 (La. 1980).

Pincite

381 So. 2d 1203 (In re Tucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related