In re Tucker

California Supreme Court

In re Tucker

83 P. 814, 7 Cal. Unrep. 243

DecidedOctober 23, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 83 P. 814 (In re Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tucker, 83 P. 814, 7 Cal. Unrep. 243 (Cal. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

CHIPMAN, P. J.

This cause was submitted when reached upon the calendar upon the written statement of attorneys for appellant that they understood that respondent was willing to submit the case upon the authority of Humiston v. Shaffer, 145 Cal. 195, 78 Pac. 651, and asked that it be so submitted.

The court ordered the case submitted upon that statement. Subsequently the respondent served and filed a motion for dismissal of the appeal, supported by an affidavit in which it appears that the subject matter of the action has been settled by the parties and that the respondent has been paid by the county auditor the amount involved in the controArersy and the judgment therein satisfied. The order heretofore submitting the cause is vacated and the motion of respondent is granted.

The appeal is dismissed, each party to pay his OAvn costs.

We concur: McLaughlin, J.; Buckles, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHIPMAN, P. J.

This cause was submitted when reached upon the calendar upon the written statement of attorneys for appellant that they understood that respondent was willing to submit the case upon the authority of Humiston v. Shaffer, 145 Cal. 195, 78 Pac. 651, and asked that it be so submitted.

The court ordered the case submitted upon that statement. Subsequently the respondent served and filed a motion for dismissal of the appeal, supported by an affidavit in which it appears that the subject matter of the action has been settled by the parties and that the respondent has been paid by the county auditor the amount involved in the controArersy and the judgment therein satisfied. The order heretofore submitting the cause is vacated and the motion of respondent is granted.

The appeal is dismissed, each party to pay his OAvn costs.

We concur: McLaughlin, J.; Buckles, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 P. 814, 7 Cal. Unrep. 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tucker-cal-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack