In re T.T.C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re T.T.C.

868 A.2d 859, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 38, 2005 WL 425425

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 2005

DocketNos. 02-FS-136, 02-FS-152 and 02-FS-153

StatusPublished

This text of 868 A.2d 859 (In re T.T.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re T.T.C., 868 A.2d 859, 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 38, 2005 WL 425425 (D.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, the consent motion of appellee, District of Columbia, to late file the lodged opposition to the petition, and the statement of appellee, L.O.C., it is

ORDERED that the motion of appellee, District of Columbia, to late file the opposition is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged opposition to the petition. It is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that this court’s opinion filed August 5, 2004, 855 A.2d 1117, is amended by striking, in their entirety, the last two sentences in the first paragraph at the top of page 1121. It is

[860]*860FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is otherwise denied; and it appearing that no judge of this court has called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI