In re T.T.

2025 Ohio 885

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: March 17, 2025
• Docket: CA2024-10-067
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as In re T.T., 2025-Ohio-885.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

WARREN COUNTY

: IN RE: : CASE NO. CA2024-10-067 T.T. : DECISION

:

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. 24-D000020

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Tyrone P. Borger, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Father, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of

proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas,

Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. Warren CA2024-10-067

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record

from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to

the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists

one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744; (3)

requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the

proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's

constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on

the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the

brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

BYRNE, P.J., M. POWELL and SIEBERT, JJ., concur.

-2-