In Re Tsulyn A. Westchester County Department of Social Services

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In Re Tsulyn A. Westchester County Department of Social Services

126 A.D.3d 967, 3 N.Y.S.3d 625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 2015

Docket2014-04375

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.3d 967 (In Re Tsulyn A. Westchester County Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Tsulyn A. Westchester County Department of Social Services, 126 A.D.3d 967, 3 N.Y.S.3d 625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Stephanie J. Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered January 23, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of adoption with regard to the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination that continuing the permanency goal of adoption was in the best interests of the subject child had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645 [2013]; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2012]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Stephanie J. Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered January 23, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of adoption with regard to the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination that continuing the permanency goal of adoption was in the best interests of the subject child had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645 [2013]; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2012]).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.3d 967, 3 N.Y.S.3d 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tsulyn-a-westchester-county-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-2015.