In re Tsulyn A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Tsulyn A.

115 A.D.3d 948, 982 N.Y.S.2d 393

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.3d 948 (In re Tsulyn A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Tsulyn A., 115 A.D.3d 948, 982 N.Y.S.2d 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered July 19, 2013, which, inter alia, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of placement for adoption with regard to the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination to continue the subject child’s placement in a kinship foster home, with the permanency goal of placement for adoption, and to continue supervised visitation, had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Diana B. v Lorry B., 111 AD3d 928, 929 [2013]; Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645 [2013]; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2012]).

Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Lammers, Ct. Atty. Ref.), entered July 19, 2013, which, inter alia, after a permanency hearing, continued the permanency goal of placement for adoption with regard to the subject child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court’s determination to continue the subject child’s placement in a kinship foster home, with the permanency goal of placement for adoption, and to continue supervised visitation, had a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Diana B. v Lorry B., 111 AD3d 928, 929 [2013]; Matter of Duane S., Jr. [Duane S.], 103 AD3d 645 [2013]; Matter of Acension C.L. [Jesate J.], 96 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2012]).

Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.3d 948, 982 N.Y.S.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tsulyn-a-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack