in Re: TSM Development and Kun W. Yu
This text of in Re: TSM Development and Kun W. Yu (in Re: TSM Development and Kun W. Yu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 21, 2017.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00853-CV
IN RE TSM DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND KUN W. YU, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11710
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Before the Court is relators’ July 20, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which they
complain of a May 19, 2017 order granting real party in interest’s motion to compel a post
judgment deposition duces tecum. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both
that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate
remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief
requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief
sought).
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE 170853F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: TSM Development and Kun W. Yu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tsm-development-and-kun-w-yu-texapp-2017.