In re T.S.
173 A.3d 266
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 26, 2017·No. No. 366 WAL 2017; No. 367 WAL 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in failing to require that the court appoint counsel for a child in a contested termination of parental rights hearing as required by 23 Pa.C.S. § 2313(a) and In re L.B.M., 161 A.3d 172 (Pa. 2017)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re T.S., 173 A.3d 266 (Pa. 2017).
173 A.3d 266 (In re T.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re T.S.
192 A.3d 1080 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)