In re Trust of Schroder

Ohio Court of Appeals

In re Trust of Schroder

107 N.E.2d 143, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 239, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 860

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 1950

DocketNo. 678

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 N.E.2d 143 (In re Trust of Schroder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Trust of Schroder, 107 N.E.2d 143, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 239, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 860 (Ohio Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT:

This is an appeal on law from the judgment of the Probate Court, Darke County, Ohio, dismissing an affidavit charging R. T. Cain with contempt of court. The affiant, being the trustee under the last will and testament of- Cora Schroder, deceased, in his affidavit charged R. T. Cain, a tenant upon the farm of which the affiant is trustee, with being in contempt of court and alleged nine separate grounds, all of which relate to the mismanagement of the farm by the tenant. There are no facts alleged in the affidavit which would support a proceeding under the provisions of §10506-67 GC. The complaint is intended to be a charge for contempt of court. The allegations made in the affidavit, if proven, do not constitute contempt of court. For any acts of mismanagement committed by the tenant the trustee will be required to pursue other legal or equitable remedies. Judgment affirmed.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

By THE COURT:

This is an appeal on law from the judgment of the Probate Court, Darke County, Ohio, dismissing an affidavit charging R. T. Cain with contempt of court. The affiant, being the trustee under the last will and testament of- Cora Schroder, deceased, in his affidavit charged R. T. Cain, a tenant upon the farm of which the affiant is trustee, with being in contempt of court and alleged nine separate grounds, all of which relate to the mismanagement of the farm by the tenant. There are no facts alleged in the affidavit which would support a proceeding under the provisions of §10506-67 GC. The complaint is intended to be a charge for contempt of court. The allegations made in the affidavit, if proven, do not constitute contempt of court. For any acts of mismanagement committed by the tenant the trustee will be required to pursue other legal or equitable remedies. Judgment affirmed.

MILLER, PJ, HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.E.2d 143, 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 239, 1950 Ohio App. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trust-of-schroder-ohioctapp-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack