In re Truesdell
175 A.D. 940
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1916·Published
Opinion
Motion denied, without costs, on the ground that the application for a stay should be made to the Court of Appeals, where the appeal is now pending. (Van Orden v. Van Orden, 27 App. Div. 136.) Present— Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Truesdell, 175 A.D. 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
175 A.D. 940 (In re Truesdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Orden v. Van Orden
27 A.D. 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)