In Re: Troy S. Poe Trust v. the State of Texas
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
IN RE: § No. 08-24-00327-CV TROY S. POE TRUST, § AN ORGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § IN MANDAMUS §
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard C. Poe, II, Relator, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus requiring the Honorable Sandee Bryan Marion, Judge of Probate Court No. 1 of El Paso County, Texas, to vacate two orders entered in the trial court’s proceeding. Specifically, Relator seeks to vacate: (1) an order signed on March 20, 2024, denying a motion to set aside an interlocutory order on competing motions for summary judgment, and (2) an order signed on July 3, 2024, denying a request for clarification and reconsideration.
To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate that he has no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 135–36. The burden is on the relator to show he is entitled to mandamus relief. See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition, response, and mandamus record, we conclude that Relator has failed to establish his entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition.
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
March 25, 2025 Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Troy S. Poe Trust v. the State of Texas (In Re: Troy S. Poe Trust v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.