In re Troy L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Troy L.

53 A.D.2d 615, 384 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 615 (In re Troy L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Troy L., 53 A.D.2d 615, 384 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 17, 1976, which, after a fact-finding determination made by the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 21, 1975, that appellant is a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation for a one-year period. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new fact-finding hearing and determination. At the fact-finding hearing, the appellant appeared with his mother and Law Guardian, but was not advised of his right to remain silent or of the consequences of waiving that right; nor was he questioned by the Family Court to ascertain whether he himself admitted the allegations of the petition (see Family Ct Act, § 741; Matter of Theodore F., 47 AD2d 945; Matter of Joseph G., 52 AD2d 924). Accordingly, these omissions mandate a new hearing before the Family Court. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated February 17, 1976, which, after a fact-finding determination made by the Family Court, Nassau County, dated November 21, 1975, that appellant is a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation for a one-year period. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new fact-finding hearing and determination. At the fact-finding hearing, the appellant appeared with his mother and Law Guardian, but was not advised of his right to remain silent or of the consequences of waiving that right; nor was he questioned by the Family Court to ascertain whether he himself admitted the allegations of the petition (see Family Ct Act, § 741; Matter of Theodore F., 47 AD2d 945; Matter of Joseph G., 52 AD2d 924). Accordingly, these omissions mandate a new hearing before the Family Court. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 615, 384 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-troy-l-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack