in Re: Troy E. Holt

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 23, 2002
Docket06-02-00181-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Troy E. Holt (in Re: Troy E. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Troy E. Holt, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

6-96-028-CV Long Trusts v. Dowd


In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana



______________________________


No. 06-02-00181-CV
______________________________


IN RE: TROY E. HOLT



Original Mandamus Proceeding






Before Morriss, C.J., Grant and Ross, JJ.



O P I N I O N



Troy E. Holt, relator, seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent, Gibson L. Hadaway, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Place 2, Bowie County, Texas, to issue citation and process on the Secretary of State and to conduct a hearing and render a decision regarding Holt's motion to take judicial notice of certain provisions of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.

Holt asserts that, on August 6, 2002, he filed suit in the justice court of Bowie County concerning the allegedly deceptive trade practices of RMF Enterprises, a resident (according to Holt's original petition) of the State of Washington. He claims the justice court has refused to forward a copy of the plaintiff's original petition to the Texas Secretary of State for service of process. On October 31, 2002, Holt filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Bowie County Court at Law. That court denied Holt's petition for a writ of mandamus on November 20, 2002. He now seeks redress in this Court.

We must address whether we have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a justice of the peace. Our power to issue writs of mandamus is not of constitutional origin, but is instead a creature of statute. A & T Consultants, Inc. v. Sharp, 904 S.W.2d 668, 685 (Tex. 1995) (Hecht, J. dissenting). Section 22.221(a), (b) of the Texas Government Code governs our jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief:

(a) Each court of appeals or a justice of a court of appeals may issue a writ of mandamus and all other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court.



  • Each court of appeals may issue all writs of mandamus agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, against a:
  • judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district; or
  • judge of a district court who is acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry under Chapter 52, Code of Criminal Procedure, in the court of appeals district.


Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon Supp. 2003). Holt's petition for a writ of mandamus does not allege that the justice court's conduct affects the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. Contrast Tex. Capital Bank-Westwood v. Johnson, 864 S.W.2d 186, 189 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 1993, no writ) (appellate court may issue writ against district court that acts to interfere with appellate court's jurisdiction). Therefore, this Court's power to issue a writ of mandamus under Section 22.221(a) is not at issue. The question remaining is whether we may issue a writ of mandamus pursuant to Section 22.221(b) to a justice of the peace.

"[S]ection 22.221(b) expressly limits this Court's jurisdiction to issuing writs against a judge of a district court in the court of appeals district.' The statute does not expressly authorize this Court to issue writs of mandamus against a justice of the peace." Easton v. Franks, 842 S.W.2d 772, 773 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist] 1992, no writ). We lack jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. Accordingly, we dismiss the original proceeding for want of jurisdiction.

BY THE COURT



Date Submitted: December 20, 2002

Date Decided: December 23, 2002



Do Not Publish

Exception Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

                                                ______________________________

                                                             No. 06-10-00060-CV

                                           IN THE MATTER OF J.T.B.

                                        On Appeal from the 2nd Judicial District Court

                                                          Cherokee County, Texas

                                                           Trial Court No. J03-088

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                              Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter


                                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

            J.T.B., a juvenile, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal.  His attorney states in the motion that “[c]ounsel has conferred with [J.T.B.] and his family who have agreed to this dismissal.”  We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

                                                                                    Jack Carter

                                                                                    Justice

Date Submitted:          September 27, 2010   

Date Decided:             September 28, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A & T CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Sharp
904 S.W.2d 668 (Texas Supreme Court, 1995)
Texas Capital Bank-Westwood v. Johnson
864 S.W.2d 186 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Easton v. Franks
842 S.W.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Troy E. Holt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-troy-e-holt-texapp-2002.