In Re Trotter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In Re Trotter

20 S.E. 386, 115 N.C. 193

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 386 (In Re Trotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Trotter, 20 S.E. 386, 115 N.C. 193 (N.C. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam :

We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam :

We have examined the authorities cited by counsel with much care, and after due consideration we conclude that his Honor erred in sustaining the action of the Clerk in refusing to accept the bond of Trotter upon the ground stated by him. It is not found that the said Trotter has been in default in any particular, except a failure to renew his bond, and this he offers to do in response to the notice served upon him. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 S.E. 386, 115 N.C. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trotter-nc-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack