In re T.R.K.
805 S.E.2d 541
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 3, 2017
DocketNo. COA17-303
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 805 S.E.2d 541 (In re T.R.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re T.R.K., 805 S.E.2d 541 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
Respondent appeals from an involuntary commitment order. On appeal, Respondent argues the trial court erred in allowing her to represent herself at the involuntary commitment hearing without complying with the applicable statutes and Rules of the Office of Indigent Defense Services. We agree and vacate and remand the order for further proceedings.
VACATED. REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re: B.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
805 S.E.2d 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trk-ncctapp-2017.