In re T.R.K.
805 S.E.2d 541
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided October 3, 2017·No. No. COA17-303·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Respondent appeals from an involuntary commitment order. On appeal, Respondent argues the trial court erred in allowing her to represent herself at the involuntary commitment hearing without complying with the applicable statutes and Rules of the Office of Indigent Defense Services. We agree and vacate and remand the order for further proceedings.
VACATED. REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re T.R.K., 805 S.E.2d 541 (N.C. Ct. App. 2017).
805 S.E.2d 541 (In re T.R.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re: B.S.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2022