In re Trisha B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Trisha B.

99 A.D.3d 530, 951 N.Y.2d 675

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.3d 530 (In re Trisha B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Trisha B., 99 A.D.3d 530, 951 N.Y.2d 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant’s challenges to the legal sufficiency of the petition [531]*531and the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing are unavailing. The evidence set forth in the petition and supporting deposition, and the similar evidence presented at the hearing, both support the inference that appellant trespassed in a Housing Authority building in violation of Penal Law § 140.10 (e) (see Matter of Lonique M., 93 AD3d 203 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant’s challenges to the legal sufficiency of the petition [531]*531and the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing are unavailing. The evidence set forth in the petition and supporting deposition, and the similar evidence presented at the hearing, both support the inference that appellant trespassed in a Housing Authority building in violation of Penal Law § 140.10 (e) (see Matter of Lonique M., 93 AD3d 203 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.3d 530, 951 N.Y.2d 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trisha-b-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack