In re Trisha B.
99 A.D.3d 530, 951 N.Y.2d 675
Opinion
Appellant’s challenges to the legal sufficiency of the petition [531] and the evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing are unavailing. The evidence set forth in the petition and supporting deposition, and the similar evidence presented at the hearing, both support the inference that appellant trespassed in a Housing Authority building in violation of Penal Law § 140.10 (e) (see Matter of Lonique M., 93 AD3d 203 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Andrias, J.P, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Trisha B., 99 A.D.3d 530, 951 N.Y.2d 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
99 A.D.3d 530 (In re Trisha B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Lonique M.
93 A.D.3d 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)