In Re Trinsey
This text of 143 B.R. 355 (In Re Trinsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re John S. TRINSEY, Jr., Debtor.
Maurice W. BAEHR, Trustee,
v.
James BEASLEY, Esquire, and Robert Vedatsky, Esquire.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Stephen Raslavich, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtor and trustee.
John S. Trinsey, Jr., pro se.
Robert J. Vedatsky, pro se.
David Zalesne, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., for James E. Beasley.
ORDER
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
For the reasons stated from the bench on February 24, 1992, it is hereby ORDERED that the Bankruptcy Court's Order of January 8, 1991, 121 B.R. 462 is REVERSED. This matter is remanded to the Bankruptcy Court for proceedings consistent with this Court's Bench Opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 B.R. 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trinsey-paed-1992.