In re Trevor C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Trevor C.

227 A.D.2d 282, 642 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5388

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 282 (In re Trevor C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Trevor C., 227 A.D.2d 282, 642 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered June 1, 1995, which adjudicated respondent-appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for 12 months and ordered him to attend school daily, following a [283]*283fact-finding determination that respondent committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

School officials conducted a proper search of respondent’s bookbag, when they reasonably suspected that respondent had acquired a full fare bus pass instead of the half fare pass to which he was entitled. A full fare pass was missing and respondent gave incredible explanation of his inability to produce his half fare pass (see, New Jersey v T. L. O., 469 US 325, 342; Matter of Gregory M., 82 NY2d 588). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered June 1, 1995, which adjudicated respondent-appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for 12 months and ordered him to attend school daily, following a [283]*283fact-finding determination that respondent committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

School officials conducted a proper search of respondent’s bookbag, when they reasonably suspected that respondent had acquired a full fare bus pass instead of the half fare pass to which he was entitled. A full fare pass was missing and respondent gave incredible explanation of his inability to produce his half fare pass (see, New Jersey v T. L. O., 469 US 325, 342; Matter of Gregory M., 82 NY2d 588). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 282, 642 N.Y.S.2d 878, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-trevor-c-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack